Collapsing Immigration Policies and the Rise of Global Nationalism

*Editor Note:  I am a senior correspondent for _Economic Affairs_.  “Jihad Packets” was in the queue for the next issue. But over the last couple of evenings I wrote what is below and asked “my team” to switch the order of operations (if possible) and run this piece first.  This is an advance look for my audience, to generate discussion regarding the peril which Europeans face.  Immigration must be orderly and movement a trickle and not a flood, for it to work.  Europe – has chaos.

Collapsing Immigration Policies and the Rise of Global Nationalism

What do you call the disenfranchised citizen on home soil, the one who has lost his voice in governance? He is a citizen-in-exile. And what happens when immigration policies collapse under the weight of a deluge of undocumented refugees? There is an equation on simple scale. It reads something like this:

(Citizens-in-exile) x (burgeoning refugee population) = y

Solving for “y” is the scary part. Y = rising global nationalism.

A rising global nationalism is the Frankenstein brought to life by mad social scientists. Having pieced together immigration and control policies based on peacetime deployment for vibrant economic corridors, the politicians now find themselves devoured by the creature of their own making. The Schengen Borders Code is in shambles. The Dublin Regulation is not being enforced. The unfettered movement of refugees from Africa and the Middle East to Europe’s shores is galvanizing a rise in global nationalism. Today, the nation of Hungary represents what is already the sentiment of native-born Europeans in microcosm. The government of Prime Minister Victor Orban is to the right and quickly speeding toward the extreme right. With a castrated EU immigration policy and tens of thousands of undocumented Muslim refugees fanning out across Europe, Mr. Orban has this to say: “This continent won’t be your home. It is our home.”  Hungary is currently engaged in what might be viewed as the “unchristian” thing to do. Hungarians are hastily erecting a razor-wire fence across their southern border. European civilization has strong Christian roots. Hungarians perceive their traditions and heritage going up in flames. Homespun charity collides with a new reality: civil strife against a geopolitical system without an assimilation clause. Emotions are at a level of meteoric challenge.

A colleague sends me this thought:

“Your label of Citizens-in-Exile is indeed an appropriate title. This corresponds to the rising sentiment amongst the Dutch population – though I have not as yet come across the use of the term. Mostly one complains of “feeling like a foreigner in one’s own street.” After more than half a century (since 1961) in Amsterdam, I do feel like being half a native, especially since I have learnt to appreciate and admire the Dutch culture and recognize how hard the generations here have worked for this.”

Step back. Reflect again on the equation. Catch a whiff of the social dynamic which is brewing in Europe.

Unfortunately, the angst over securing borders and staunching the refugee’s mad scramble onto the continent is anchored to an erroneous thought. Human rights are not the domain of the international stage. Human rights are to be adjudicated first and foremost within the state on behalf of the citizen. The strongest metric, belongs to the citizen. By example, the human rights which Europeans and Americans embrace reflect well on our benevolent form of governance. But by the same token, we do not bear the ultimate responsibility for human rights abuses occurring within other nations.

We have erred in seeking to move human rights to a global stage. The United Nations and their coterie of senseless representatives continue to hawk an ideal which is not practiced in many of their own countries. They are hypocrites.

Each nation stands responsible for maintaining the rights of their own citizenry. God and history will ultimately judge harshly those who have abused human rights. Conversely, democratic nations seeking to prioritize the welfare of their citizens should not be ostracized for administering policies which protect their generations. Healthy governance invests in the citizen and strengthens the citizen in his love for his country. Good governance creates an economic model which espouses generational blessing.

In compassionate manner, we can reach outside our borders to assist the other. But compassion is not equal to habitation. If we truly believe that compassion is equal to habitation, ask yourself the following:  Are you willing to bring a refugee family under your roof and provide them with food, lodging, clothing, education and medical care – whilst giving the same from your personal funds? Can you sustain this program for years, or possibly a decade? So compassion is not synonymous with habitation. Nor is the chaotic flood of refugees into Europe a sign of compassion. Rather, it is strong signal of collapsing immigration policies which are creating a global rising nationalism.

Dublin procedures are not being followed. The refugee must seek asylum in the nation where their foot first touches land. Visas for travel are not in hand. As stated in one article, “A train ticket does not overwrite EU rules.” Refugees are sleeping on sidewalks, in parks, and clogging public corridors of transit. Citizens are frightened. The refugees have created a sense of citizens under siege.

There is another paradigm regarding crumbling immigration policy. It is that of plight vs. practicality. Yes, the plight of any given refugee population across the march of history can be gut-wrenching.   But plight must never overwhelm the practicality of a nation with regard to its own national treasure: the citizen base. In seeking to make room for those fleeing a volatile societal rim we expose the Gordian knot. The very act of “making room” on large and sudden scale can cause Western civilization to implode. Politicians are creating the next volatile societal rim.

The implosion of Europe may be slow, but a brutal future is in store if European leaders do not regain control of their borders. Europe is facing rising global nationalism. This nationalism is coming with a shout from citizens-in-exile engulfed in a disaster not of their own making. They are observing a flood of refugees who have no part in the sacrifices borne by their ancestors; refugees who are predominantly Muslim; a large mass who will most likely fail to assimilate into Western civilization and her coveted values. Mix it all up. Feel the emotional pulse of citizens with an intense sense of betrayal. Nationalism is on the rise. I lack the wisdom to pronounce a cure. But I can identify the cause. In February, Islamic State threatened a flood of refugees to destabilize Europe.  This is a form of soft warfare.

Economic Affairs

Advertisements

Published by

thelastenglishprince

You may check out my primary site: tammyswofford.com Interests: *Geopolitical Islam *Healthy Governance Initiatives *Societal Homeostasis

6 thoughts on “Collapsing Immigration Policies and the Rise of Global Nationalism”

  1. Linked.

    I think that the implosion will arrive quicker than we think because of the concept of human rights — as well as the blame game (the West’s meddling in Islamic nations).

    This is a major clash of civilizations! With the waves of migrants being predominantly angry young males.

    Like

  2. AOW,

    Just by the numbers, the refugee crisis can be considered a form of “soft warfare”. After all, several months ago Islamic State threatened Europe with a flood of refugees. Casting a gaze back to Osama bin Laden, he threatened to bankrupt the economies of the West.

    Embedded within the mass, or extracted FROM the mass – will be future jihadi who will commit acts of terror on European soil.

    For the moment, I am grateful that my home is not an isolated farmhouse straddling the transit corridor of potentially millions of immigrants. Think Tahrir Square and Lara Logan was a nasty deal? Again, dynamically what is happening looks like soft warfare and should be treated as such.

    Like

  3. I amended the post to include the concept of soft warfare. In continued research regarding the current crisis it is noted that in February Islamic State threatened to flood Europe with refugees in an act of destabilization. Europe – lacking vigilance – did not prepare for the same. They are now engaged in a form of soft warfare with non-combatants. But it must also be remembered that Islamic State also promised to embed terror cells with the refugee population. PM Merkel has a distinct problem. Germany has prided themselves on being essentially terror free on native soil. My prediction? Germany will soon make the headlines regarding terror. There are too many people (many of them without any form of identification – hence invisible to our terror identification networks) for security forces to effectively monitor.

    Regarding another form of soft warfare: jihad porn using dead babies – the dynamic creates guilt. But what will European leaders do about the growing panic among their citizens? They have betrayed on large scale, their European citizens. For me, that is the unforgivable part of the equation. What is unforgiveable, is that they are responsible for the growing nationalism.

    Like

Comments are closed.